Accepted Abstracts
Mr Phillip Anderson
Economic Indicator Services
Melbourne Victoria
Co-Author: Mr Terence Duffy, Economic Indicator Services
The History of Canberra: Lessons for Today’s Cities in
How to Remain Affordable, Liveable and Self Sustaining.
The Federation of Australia in 1901 and the
creation of a new capital city for Australia was a
unique opportunity in time and the politicians of that
era had firm intentions that the new capital city was to
remain affordable, liveable, no longer be subject to the
massive real estate speculation that had plagued all
other Australian cities during the early 1890's, and
finally relieve the nation's capital of the dreadful
booms and busts that had been so typical of 19th century
living.
This presentation will explore why the politicians of
Federation took this dramatic turn, what were the
implications for its initial development, and then to
bring this to the relevance of the present day, using
EIS studies and data resources. The focus will be on the
implications of the early Canberra model, for housing
affordability and the eighteen year property cycle,
successfully observed and monitored by EIS over the past
twenty years.
Mr Guy Barnett
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems
Canberra ACT
Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of Green
Infrastructure
This presentation provides an overview of research being
undertaken in CSIRO’s Climate Adaptation Flagship to
investigate the role of the urban environment in
mediating the likely impacts of climate change on human
health and well being. We conceptualise green
infrastructure as one several important elements
comprising our urban environment.
Using the climate change impact of extreme heatwave
events as a focus, we use remote sensing to measure the
thermal performance (land surface temperature) of
different types of urban form to establish the specific
contribution of green infrastructure. What we find is
significant spatial variability in the vulnerability of
urban environments to extreme heatwave events. Ecosystem
services provided by green infrastructure reduce the
frequency and severity of these extreme events, and will
be integral to climate adaptation strategies.
The degree of buffering generally increases with the
overall amount of vegetated space present in a city.
Climate adaptation is therefore best conceptualised as
comprising a ‘palette of options’ from planning, design
and physical interventions (i.e., retrofitting, cool
roofs, urban greening) through to the promotion of
behavioural change and coping strategies to help people
to adapt to extreme heat (e.g., warning systems, social
networks). Yet there remain many complex trade-offs in
terms of where and what kinds of interventions to
utilise to transition to healthier urban environments.
Mr Omar Barragan
Auckland City Council
Auckand
The exclusion of children and families from modern high
density environments- From Bogota to Auckland.
High density is heralded as a foremost smart-growth
instrument to reduce land consumption and automobile
dependence. In practice, densities play a key role in
the way planners and designers understand how cities
function. However traditional and contemporary
discourses about high density living are contradictory.
On the one hand, high density public housing and its
occupants have been constructed as deviant, an aspect of
contemporary life that cities must endure, while luxury
apartments are celebrated in variety of ways.
Furthermore, in most developed nations, the notion that
children and heterosexual nuclear families are excluded
in high density discourses reinforces this
condtradiction.
Auckland in New Zealand has experienced this trend for
many years where development in the city centre and city
fringe suburbs have alienated children and families in
most recent housing and mixed use projects. By contrast,
in the Latin American context, Bogota has developed
sustainable higher density developments such as ‘Ciudad
Salitre’ that are firmly understood as welcoming of
children where in fact children in these environments
are desirable for social interaction and community
cohesion.
This paper presents the research of ‘Ciudad Salitre’ as
an example of a sustainable higher density development
that has become a legitimised response to concerns about
urban sprawl. It compares and contrasts with Auckland’s
desire and failures to achieve similar urban
environments. This research demonstrates how two cities
face similar challenges in relation to urban sprawl, how
Bogota has understood the importance of housing
diversity designed for social cohesion and the
importance of children in urban planning, and the way
that Auckland continues to deliver childless
neighbourhoods. This research shows from a practical and
theoretical perspective how high density housing fits
neatly into urban consolidation models and how is now
considered to be integral to the production of
economically and environmentally sustainable cities.
Mr Adam Beck
Geeen Building Council of Australia
Brisbane Qld
Influencing Sustainable Cities of the Future though
Green Star Communities
As Australia’s cities continue to enlarge, the efforts
extended by government and industry to shape them
sustainably are being challenged. With national policy
seeking strategic sustainable investment opportunities
in our cities, guidance on the relevant issues,
priorities and standards is now critical. One issue in
particular that is being sought out by government and
industry is a nationally consistent language around
sustainable communities.
In response to this, the Green Building Council of
Australia, with the support of government and industry
around Australia, has created a national framework for
sustainable communities. The framework establishes five
national principles to shape the evolution of
communities, both new and existing ones. It addresses
the issues of liveability, prosperity, environmental
quality, placemaking and urban governance.
The framework will be available to help government and
industry in evolving our sustainable cities of the
future. It has been developed in collaboration with
government stakeholders, industry professionals,
practitioners, research and academia, professional
associations and other representative groups.
Importantly, the framework establishes the foundations
for Green Star Communities, the GBCA’s newest tool
helping transition Australia to a sustainable built
environment future.
Mr Chris Begert
Sustainable Built Environments (SBE)
Melbourne VIC
Co-Author: Ms Imm Chew, Sustainable Built Environments &
Mr Ben Cuter, Sustainable Built Environments
How to implement ESD in the planning process
Local Governments have long been trying to enhance the
environmental performance of the built environment
through implementing ESD in the planning process.
Process as well as resource related problems often
hinder the effective implementation, thus creating
frustrations among town planners, architects, developers
and other stakeholders.
Local Governments face a variety of issues when pushing
for enhanced sustainability assessments and requirements
in the planning process. Since neither a state nor a
national framework exists, the stipulated requirements
often trigger potentially expensive and time consuming
VCAT hearings.
On the resource side a number of issues arise: currently
Local Governments feel that there are no tools existing
that can cater for their specific needs and tend to
develop their own tools. Councils are often not equipped
with the funding required for keeping these tools up to
date.
How can we overcome these issues? During recent work
with Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) and a
number Victorian Local Councils the idea of creating a
joint council and industry initiative evolved. Could
establishing a ‘Green Planning Council’ provide a
platform for implementing ESD in the planning process?
This paper will examine the opportunities and challenges
of this idea and suggest a framework for the further
development of a ‘Green Planning Council’.
A/Prof Darren Bilsborough
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Adelaide SA
Strategic Planning Responses to City Vulnerability
With now over 50% of the world's population and 90% of
Australia's population living in urban areas, our cities
are becoming increasingly more vulnerable. The risks to
our cities and to our cities residents has never been
greater with multiple threats from climate change, the
multiple PEAKS of peak food, peak water, peak oil, the
pollution of our air, waterways and soils, our ever
diminishing natural resources and biodiversity and to
our general health and well being.
These risks can be averted but only through
strategically planning for the mitigation of these risks
into the future.
The Federal government has recognised this urgent need
through mandating that State and Territories will have
capital city strategic plans that meet national criteria
for transport, housing, urban development and
sustainability by 2012. The government’s intention is
for the plans to contribute to lifting economic
productivity, responding to climate change and ensuring
the nation is geared up for 35 million people by 2049.
These plans are intended to deliver better integrated
and longer term infrastructure and land use plans to
improve housing affordability, better transport to
tackle urban congestion, and new urban developments that
provide superior linkages to transport, jobs and
services.
This paper will discuss the opportunites for a different
approach to developing our cities with particular
emphasis on transport, energy and climate change
adaptation, but with the view of achieving better
outcomes in favour of our nation’s productivity,
security, health and general well being in line with the
federal government’s ambitions.
Mr Peter Boyle
Victorian Government
Melbourne VIC
Co-Author: Ms Amanda Millis, Senior Project Manager
Victorian Government
Strengthening Victoria’s Liveability by Building Design
Knowledge and Capability
Victoria’s towns and cities are growing and changing at
a higher rate than those in other states, including New
South Wales and Western Australia, and Melbourne’s
population, is likely to reach five million by 2030.
Urban designers will play a significant role in
influencing the shape of Melbourne in the context of the
city’s rapid growth, and managing challenges, such as
climate change, an ageing population and housing growth
requirements.
The key challenge for the Victorian Government is having
the right policy settings to continue to deliver a
strong economy whilst preserving and enhancing our
quality of life. Increasingly we are aware of the need
to design our built environment in more sustainable ways
for the benefit of current and future generations.
In response, the Victorian Government’s Urban Design
Unit has developed an innovative urban design training
resource to support and contribute to the implementation
of government’s urban policies including Melbourne 2030:
a planning update and ‘Melbourne @ 5 million’.
This evidence informed paper demonstrates that to
achieve higher standards of urban design, we need to
build expertise and urban design knowledge of built
environment professionals, particularly those who make
or influence decisions about development.
An independent evaluation of the Urban Design Training
Program for Victoria 2006-2009 found the program is
meeting its aims and objectives in terms of delivering
better design outcomes for places. This has been
achieved by shaping future communities, providing higher
density residential developments, designing activity
centres and improving public safety resulting from
better designed and developed public environments.
Mr Richard Brecknock
Brecknock Consulting P/L
Norwood SA
Planninf for Culture & Creativity in Australian Cities
Public art has long been recognised as an essential
contributor to the physical expression of culture and
creativity in the public realm. In countless cities
around the world there are wonderful examples of public
art that tell the story of the people, their histories
and their aspirations.
This paper will raise the critical question, when
considering the future of public spaces should public
art be an outcome of city planning or left entirely to
the individual inspiration of the artist? Richard
Brecknock will draw upon his thirty years as a public
artist, cultural planner and public art consultant to
explore the context in which public art is planned,
conceptualised and executed. He will review the many
policy and planning platforms that support the
contemporary commissioning of public art in Australian
cities, including government policies, percent for art
obligations on the private sector and the role of art in
plot ratio bonuses considerations.
The presenter will provide a visual insight into
contemporary practice and the incredible diversity of
public art. He will show examples of permanent,
temporary and ephemeral artworks from cities around the
country and overseas.
Dr Catherine Bridge
University of NSW
Sydney NSW
Co-Author: Ms Anne-Marie Elias, Council on the Ageing
NSW
Future proofing our environments for an ageing
population
There is growing recognition across all spheres of
government that the ageing of Australia’s population
will necessitate many policy and planning shifts.
Creating age friendly environments is about future
proofing our infrastructure and it has to be done now to
support the anticipated demographic changes as we
approach 2030 when twenty-five percent of the population
will be aged 65 and over.
Age friendly design supports active living, good health
and social connectedness for all ages. For example, well
lit and maintained public spaces are welcoming, promote
safety and encourage more active lifestyles; transport
that is accessible allows all people, young and old, to
remain linked to social networks, services and
employment; and something as basic as a well maintained
footpath can promote prolonged mobility for older people
(Checklist of Essential Features of Age- friendly
Cities: World Health Organisation).
A holistic approach to planning for an ageing population
through good urban planning and design, housing design
and transport will contribute to the mobility,
participation, social inclusion and well being of people
of all ages and abilities.
Dr Catherine Bridge and Anne-Marie Elias will highlight
key aspects of population ageing that will impact on and
reframe the way planners and designers create the built
environment. They will share their insights in working
with councils, designers and planners in promoting age
friendly environments.
Ms Brigitte Buchholz
Arup
Sydney NSW
The City of the Future – Visions of Tomorrowland
Over hundreds of years, humans have dreamed of a 'City
of the Future'. Artists painted, architects and planners
sketched, theorists and writers wrote, and film makers
produced utopian vision after vision. What is it that
continuously makes us dream of Tomorrowland?
This presentation will explore a range of past and
current visions, highlight their importance and describe
their impact on society then and now. Looking back at
past dreams of a better or worse future will discover
the motives behind these visions. What were the drivers
for Fritz Lang's utopian vision of Metropolis? What was
the background of the ‘Broadacre City’ by Frank Lloyd
Wright? How does Star Trek and Sim City fit into all
this?
Visions encourage the politician to take a bold
decision, the private developer to invest, the community
member to support rather than complain. There is a
strong recognition in the built environment industry
that visioning is an integral part of good design, of
en-visioning a better, different future. What we can
learn from past visions can inform what we do today.
Mrs Sidonie Carpenter
Green Roofs Australia
Fig Tree Pocket Qld
Green Roofs and Walls - an essential element for the
future of sustainable urbanism
Due to the large demands for food, energy and water, the
growth in urban populations has and will continue to
create a unique set of environmental problems, both
within cities and in the surrounding areas. Many of
these problems are either directly caused or exacerbated
by the removal of vegetation to accommodate urban
expansion. It is expected that many of these problems
will be further exacerbated by climate change.
By 2005, 50% of the world’s population will live in
cities (Bindé, 1998), and in the industrialized world,
the figure has already surpassed 80%.
One design solution that provides and a solution to the
many issues faced by urbanisation, is the implementation
of green walls and roofs, a very real and achievable
solution for supporting a sustainable environment.
In Australia, till now, green walls and roofs have been
overlooked as a design priority or concern, thus at this
stage we have limited knowledge and skill base for their
design and implementation. It is an area that offers
many diverse applications with outcomes that directly
benefit society, the economy and the environment.
The diverse issues shaping the discussion of viable
agronomic systems in the urban fabric must continue to
be pursued if we are to be successful in our leadership
of the sustainable movement. This pursuit will guide the
industry toward meeting our environmental
responsibilities and project a broader meaning for green
walls and roofs into the urban fabric.
Ms Cathryn Chatburn
AECOM
Brisbane QLD
Creating flexible frameworks for sustainable living
Concern about the impact of urbanisation upon the health
of the planet and its inhabitants is refocusing
attitudes towards the way we build. And where planners,
architects, and theorists imagined urban frameworks
through which communities would live out more fulfilled
lives, today’s designers are re-imagining the future to
reduce the environmental footprint of our activities to
deliver more sustainable development.
Physical issues of size, mix, layout and density,
building forms, movement patterns, materials, and
resource efficiency are all being considered in the
quest to define new models for sustainable urban
settlements. As these changes have been understood, they
have been translated into an increasingly prolific
catalogue of government policies, objectives, and
targets used to inform and drive professional practice.
Creating sustainable cities requires a re-thinking of
built form as an ‘architecture of engagement’. Buildings
are thought of in terms of their layers and as a
collection of expandable and flexible spaces. Garden
space can be established on roofs and transformed for
weekly markets. Real time public transport schedules can
be made available, as well as live feed information on
the building’s energy, water, and waste performance.
This new model will bring greater levels of ‘urban
stewardship’ as the community evolves.
Encouraging more sustainable lifestyles requires more
than the delivery of high-density development and land
efficiencies. Good urban design is the process of
shaping physical settings for life. Effective
sustainable urban design should have the capacity, when
considered comprehensively, to deliver the frameworks
within which lives can be lived more sustainably.
Ms Kirsty Chessher
UDIA (Qld)
Brisbane QLD
Co-Author: Mr Brian Stewart, Chief Executive and General
Counsel UDIA (Qld)
EnviroDevelopment – The Successes and Challenges of
Getting Sustainable Runs on the Board
Launched in Queensland in 2006, EnviroDevelopment was
developed by UDIA (Qld) to encourage more sustainable
development. Over the four years since its inception,
EnviroDevelopment has grown significantly and the
adoption of the system in an additional three states has
broadened the profile of the branding system.
Already EnviroDevelopment has achieved significant
outcomes in terms of sustainability. The nine
developments certified under EnviroDevelopment,
representing nearly 15,000 lots/units and 9,200m2 of
industrial space, have been calculated to save nearly
1,500ML/yr of potable water and over 42,000 tonnes of
greenhouse gas and contribute over 960 hectares of
conservation/green space.
EnviroDevelopment certification requires a much higher
level of sustainability in development than regulation,
and creates a positive environment for innovation. It is
particularly strong in encouraging integration between
all project team members to work to a common
sustainability goal by providing further incentive to
deliver enhanced sustainability outcomes in new
developments.
With broad coverage, both across sustainability issues
and all stages of land subdivision and development, it
clarifies the components of sustainability into a
comprehensible whole, easily communicated to the market.
EnviroDevelopment has separate elements with relating to
water, energy, waste, materials, ecosystems and
community. The certification process requires strong
commitments, supporting evidence, site visits and
assessment by dedicated staff and a highly qualified
Board of Management.
This presentation will examine the progress of
EnviroDevelopment since its inception, its achievements
to date and challenges for the future. It outlines some
of the outstanding initiatives incorporated by certified
EnviroDevelopments around Australia, including examples
of climate-responsive designs which enhance our urban
places and foster and encourage active and healthy
communities.
Mr Giovanni Cirillo
NSW Government
SYDNEY NSW
Transforming Sydney - The Imperative of Transit Oriented
Urban Renewal
It has been estimated that Sydney’s population will grow
by 1.7 million people over the next 25 years, reaching 6
million by 2036.
In 2005, the Sydney Metropolitan Strategy established
that in order to manage this population growth in the
most sustainable way possible, Sydney needs to
accommodate 70% of its projected growth within its
existing urban areas.
This means that around 445,000 new dwellings will be
necessary by 2031, or over 17,000 dwellings per year.
To deliver this critical supply of housing, a
fundamental rethink of the traditional suburban
expansion model is necessary. The time has come to
reimagine Sydney by replanning its strategic centres and
corridors.
To make this happen, the NSW policy framework will need
to change to promote ‘transit oriented urban renewal’
and achieve the objectives of the Sydney Metropolitan
Strategy 2010.
Sydney needs vibrant local centres, and to increase the
supply of medium density housing and local business
opportunities in accessible locations.
We need to ensure the best use of existing and planned
public transport, services and infrastructure, relieving
pressure on ‘greenfield’ sites on the City’s edge to
deliver housing for Sydney’s growing population.
The future of planning in Sydney must integrate new
public transport infrastructure with the surrounding
local area’s future land use controls, to get the best
benefit for communities from the substantial investment
by government. We owe it to our Cities and to our
descendants.
Mr Gareth Collins
NSW Roads and Traffic Authority
North Sydney NSW
The value to the built environment of an urban design
approach to road infrastructure.
Roads are significant pieces of our built environment.
In their best manifestations they are the armatures of
built form; the 'stage' for businesses and public
buildings; a place for cafe life and local shopping;
part of the curtillages of our homes; the major walking
and cycling linkages within the public domain; a
resource for recreation and tourism; and a public space
within which we spend considerable amounts of time.
Many roads authorities in recent years have come to
understand these imperatives and how they are critical
to achieving success. The RTA is no exception. In an
atmosphere of intense public scrutiny over its projects,
it has, in the last 10 years, significantly improved its
built outcomes and developed a comprehensive urban
design approach to road design.
This decade long 'journey' has lead to many insights.
Such as the best processes and principles of managing
urban design; how standard forms of contract can be
modified to capture urban design principles; and what is
good transportation design and what is simply a costly
and unsustainable liability.
These lessons have been included in the recently
published and award winning RTA policy, titled 'Beyond
the Pavement: urban design policy procedures and
principles'.
Referring to Beyond the Pavement, this paper will
explain the value of urban design in road
transportation. It will describe the main principles of
achieving urban design and illustrate these with
numerous project examples.
Dr Sean Connelly
University of Hawaii
Kaneohe HI
Density x Dispersal: Typological Transformations for a
Future Ahupua'a
The idealized image of Hawai‘i as an ‘exotic paradise’
conceals a major problem—environmental degradation. If
society cannot achieve a sustainable equilibrium on an
island, is it possible to do so worldwide? As a
testament to the balance between anthropogenic activity
and ocean-island ecosystems, this dissertation in
architecture and environmental design offers conceptual,
optimistic strategies envisioning a healthier,
self-reliant Hawai'i.
This dissertation begins with an analysis of the
“traditional” political-economic land classification
system of pre-1778 Hawai'i—the ahupua‘a—which enabled
aboriginal Hawaiians to assist rather than destroy their
ecosystems through a lifestyle of interconnected
relationships among ecology, kinship, leadership,
cooperation, knowledge, and sustenance. The current
state of degradation is then critiqued as a product of
problematic “western” planning strategies, which unlike
the ahupua‘a, reinforce disaggregated relationships
among society, ecology, and economy. Referenced in
particular are O‘ahu’s urbanized ecosystems, divided
into mono-functional land-use and zoning districts that
fragment the continuity between mountain and ocean
habitats.
This dissertation concludes with a theoretical framework
for neighborhood redevelopment that blends successful
“traditional” Hawaiian knowledge with modern “western”
knowledge, so that urbanized ecosystems can thrive. The
framework is presented as a design synthesis and
multi-scalar, systematic approach to architecture and
environmental design, with focuses on: geopolitical
leadership; integrated place-based land-use;
riparian/shoreline setbacks; localized food systems;
sustainable education; cooperative community networks;
affordable housing; regenerative infrastructures; and
overall ecosystem restoration. This dissertation
introduces a holistic way of thinking aimed to shift the
trajectory of the modern-day built environment away from
degradation and toward an inspirational, prosperous
future.
Mr David Cooke
Hames Sharley
Adelaide SA
Co-Author: Mr Paul Drechsler, Hames Sharley
Transit Oriented Development. Reconciling Sprawl with
Economic Benefits
Transit oriented development (TOD) requires much more
than a train stations surrounded by medium density
residential development. It is argued that TOD should
address regional employment as a key driver, in order
that dispersed metropolitan regions are sustainable in
economic terms.
Perth is an excellent example of a mature capital city
rail network that has undergone significant expansion in
the past decade in response to sustained metropolitan
growth, perhaps unrivalled in Australia. This paper
examines train ridership in Perth and efforts to create
successful TODs throughout the network, including the
benefits of retrofitting existing transit nodes as TODs.
It then explores the path that Adelaide is currently
undertaking under the 30 Year plan to create economic
nodes, based around infrastructure. The paper also
discuss lessons learnt from North American, which is
compared to both Perth and Adelaide.
It is proposed that some transit oriented development
can actually exacerbate urban sprawl, which needs to be
reconciled with the advantages of mass transit versus
car dependence for work trips. This paper argues that
properly planned and designed TOD can contribute to
regional self-sufficiency if the activity mix is right
and there is a long term commitment from government and
the community.
Mr Robert Cooper
CPG Australia Pty Ltd
South Melbourne Vic
Putting a Value on Landscape
‘Landscape’, is the totality of conditions, natural and
constructed, physical and abstract, in which our
settlement takes place.
For many reasons urban design for growth and change is
leading increasingly to our expressing the worth of
‘Landscape’ in tradable terms. ‘Landscape’ has indeed
become a suite of commodities and one that adapts
surprisingly easily to the language of international
trading floors and government budgeting. But is this to
the detriment of ‘good design’?
This paper looks at our historical refusal to value or
place a value on the ecological, cultural and designed
aspects of our ‘landscapes’ and contrasts this with the
relatively recent focus on ‘Landscape’ costs and
benefits in economies founded on competition. Against a
background of relevant images from Melbourne, Australia,
the paper looks at key frameworks for analysing,
quantifying and prioritising the allocation of resources
to ‘Landscape’: amongst these are Green Infrastructure
thinking, Ecosystems Services valuations and climate
change adaptation responses. New currencies spawned by
this approach are discussed and include the ‘Habitat
Hectare’, ‘PPM Suspended Solids’ and others dealing with
health and visual evaluation.
The paper calls for designers to remain unintimidated by
greater discussion of the economic value of their
outputs. It argues that good ‘Landscape’ design, in the
sense not only of how it looks but also how it works, is
possible and indeed is facilitated by this direct
participation on the economic playing field that will be
the setting of our new and adapted cities of the future.
Ms Tanya Court
University of Adelaide
Adealide S.A.
Catalyst: Public Art and Urban Design Intersections
Public art can be broadly defined as any artistic
production in the public domain. Public art
traditionally performs civic duties yet public art is a
constantly evolving discipline. Changes to society and
the shifting and contested definitions of the public are
reflected in public art approaches. “If public art as
Arlene Raven has suggested, ‘isn’t a hero on a hero on a
horse any more’ that is not only because of changes in
artistic practice, but because the conditions and
possibilities of public life... have undergone such
profound and varied transformations in the late modern
era”. (Mitchell pp.2-3)
There are clearly overlaps with the concerns of public
art and urban design, especially animation of public
space, creation of character and meaning and support of
contemporary culture and the civilizing role of public
open space. This paper will explore the intersections of
public art and urban design and make proposals for new
possibilities for adventurous public art commissioning
that embraces uncertainty and temporality, conditions of
the city itself. In particular, the role of public art
as a catalyst at the inception of urban design work will
be considered.
The paper will use my project “The Rundle Project:
Integrated Public Art Masterplan as a case study. The
Rundle Project was commissioned by Adelaide City Council
to provide direction for the facilitation and
commissioning of public artworks within Rundle Street,
Adelaide. The project was undertaken by Tanya Court
(landscape architect, artist and academic), Warwick
Keates (landscape architect and urban designer), Craige
Andrea (artist and public artist) and Naomi Horridge
(curator and creative writer).
Ms Michelle Cramer
Woods Bagot
Sydney NSW
Technology and Public Space: Designing the public domain
for mobile media technology
The success of Facebook, MySpace, online dating agencies
and similar social technologies have proven that people
continue to be interested in connecting and sharing
their interests and knowledge... via technology. While
contemporary technologists and philosophers argue the
social technologies have succeeded in creating a “new”
and “virtual” public space, the truth is much of this
activity is occurring in the physical public realm ...
while people grab their lunch in a food court, wait for
the bus or train, linger on the steps of Town Hall for a
friend, or anticipate better surf at the beach.
Access to technology anywhere, anytime need not just be
an individual pursuit, but an enabler to bring people
together. No longer physically tied to the classroom,
boardroom, or office space, people can gather outside
the traditional learning and working environments to
learn and work! Much like the shift from the traditional
office to open planned, activity based workplaces, the
opportunity exists for mobile media technologies to
provide the foundation for new activities and uses
within the public realm and, consequently, the
reconsideration of how those places are designed.
Technology magazines dedicate much editorial to virtual
space, psychologists have researched how digital
technologies have altered accepted behaviours within the
physical public realm, public artists have explored
digital media interactions ... the question that is
posed here is how can current technology breath new life
and activation into the urban environment and how does
it change the design public domain?
Dr Phillip Daffara
Futuresense
Mountain Creek Qld
City Making Futures
The aim of the presentation is to provoke the audience
into becoming self aware of their assumptions and
paradigms that influence their role and decisions as
city planners/designers. If we are unaware of the
professional biases shaping our choices, we cannot truly
plan for tomorrow’s human settlements in a transitioning
world. The underlying cultural forces are exposed by
describing four scenarios of the future city and for
each, revealing the contrasting planning paradigms and
roles of the planner operating within each system.
The scenarios (Technocity; Collapse/urban decay; SmArt
City; Eco City) are based on the polar relationships of
urban planning policy and the urban development
industry. From the “tale of four cities”, the
implications for the future roles and skills of the
planner are discussed. The paper proposes 5 key practice
trends that the city planner/manager needs to build
capability around to be effective city makers and remain
relevant in navigating complex, urban transitions.
Ms Jenny Donovan
DLA
South Melbourne VIC
Designing Human Habitat; Socially Responsible Urban
Design
This paper will suggest an approach to urban design that
seeks to ensure that no one is disadvantaged by their
surroundings.
The way towns and cities are designed can have profound
and often unintended consequences on the ability of
people to thrive and fulfil their potential. Our
surroundings influence the opportunities available to us
to forge the bonds of community, to meet our needs and
express ourselves. Our surroundings make something’s
easy, some things difficult and some things impossible.
The paper will seek to shed some light on how our towns
and cities embody values and can have a profound effect
on the quality of people’s lives by effectively making
people prisoners of their surroundings, limited in the
opportunities available to them. This paper will then
suggest some ideas about how our urban areas can be
designed to help counter economic, social disadvantage.
Mr Kolawole Ewedairo
Maribyrnong City Council
Footscray Victoria
Sola Energy and efficient building design: Adjoining
dwelling and legislation impact
The future is here and the now is the future. Cost of
energy over the years has been moving northwards,
increasing over the years. The alternative with the
assistance of government incentives is to take the
consider how to reduce the cost of energy while not
necessarily reducing comfort and carbon footprint.
When energy efficient building design are considered,
emphasis has often been placed on individual building as
an island on its own, hence design principle are
discussed for individual buildings.
However, it is a fact that adjoining dwellings can
affect efficiency of the building, more importantly when
it comes to generating energy through the sun by the
building. In the same vein, legislation can as well
affect energy efficiency of home.
The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of
adjoining dwelling, legislation and home orientation on
ability of buildings to generate own power through the
use of solar panels.
Generating energy through the use of solar panel has
come to stay and the extent to which this is maximised
has been identified to be affected by orientation of
building, however, shadow from adjoining building can
significantly reduce solar energy captured. While north
facing solar panel produce more energy compared to solar
panels at other location, shadow effect can considerably
reduce this efficiency.
Dr Dianne Firth
University of Canberra
Canberra ACT
Green Infrastructure: Asset or Liability?
Australia’s embrace of garden city, new town and
national park ideologies over the twentieth century has
provided cities such as Canberra with a green
infrastructure legacy of urban forest and low density
suburbs spaced across the landscape and separated by an
extensive open space system. Although this green
infrastructure is perceived as an asset in aesthetic,
ecological and cultural terms, it is also a complex
system to manage and for governments to fund.
Recent events have brought about the need to reappraise
its values. The devastating bush fires of 2003 that
seemed to access the city through the open space system,
urban growth with the preference for suburban
development on green-field sites, declining urban trees
and parklands, prolonged drought and predicted climate
change, are turning the asset into a liability. These
events also bring focus on our ability to manage the
extent of the existing green infrastructure in a
sustainable way.
The National Capital Authority and the Australian
Capital Territory Government, in recognising Canberra’s
specific cultural heritage value as the national capital
and a city by design as well as its natural heritage
values and national water quality obligations, are
aspiring to conserve its symbolic landscapes, urban
forest, endangered ecosystems and better manage water.
With the current question of how the city is to grow,
both Governments are investigating changes that may
impact on the existing green infrastructure of the city.
This paper establishes the strengths and weaknesses of
Canberra’s green infrastructure, traces approaches taken
by both the NCA and ACT Government to manage the system,
discusses actions taken to involve the community, and
reviews the current debate regarding development within
Canberra’s National Capital Open Space System. The paper
concludes with scenarios for a future sustainable green
infrastructure for the ACT.
Mr Mark Frisby
FFLA
Docklands VIC
Place, sustainability and community
A tiny proportion of our cities are renewed on an annual
basis placing a greater imperative on the contribution
each site makes to a more equitable and sustainable
future. Too often projects focus on aesthetic outcomes
rather than addressing fundamental social and ecological
needs. If we are to create relevant, responsive and
sustainable places, a shift in how we approach projects
is necessary.
This presentation explores the processes employed in
recent public realm projects that seek to provide the
community with a more sustainable future. The
methodology applied to each project includes extensive
community engagement and research which leads to an
understanding of local values the needs of the people
that inhabit the space. Design propositions respond to
these values as well as having consideration for the
contribution the place makes to its surrounds or how it
sits within a broader ecological systems. The outcomes
are diverse (reflective of the needs of each place) but
they are underpinned by common social, economic and
sustainability ambitions.
Ms Diana Griffiths
Arup
Sydney NSW
Co-Author: Ms Emma Synnott, Arup
Adaptive resilience – solutions for the ecological age
Faced with a predicted population growth to 36 million
over the next 40 years and the imperative to address the
challenges of the ecological age, communities across
Australia are grappling with the impact they will have
on the shape and long term resilience of our cities.
What are the places and systems that can adapt to future
needs and enable the healthy and vibrant communities
that we desire?
Current systems and political structures encourage
fragmented thinking which can only address individual
parts of the solution. It has become necessary to
identify local typologies and data and to 'map' and
occasionally to challenge the logic that supports
typologies within cities. In our recent desire to
embrace a "silver bullet" solution like urban density,
have we forgotten to consider the critical links between
built form and adaptability, transport, health and
community structures?
We can no longer assume that the mistakes we make today
can be demolished and rebuilt by our children. To create
successful urban futures we need a framework within
which urban typologies can be teased apart and assessed
and that identify the social (eg health and
connectedness) and economic implications of the
typologies being considered.
Through a presentation of a model, created to assess the
sustainability benefits of a precinct, this paper will
explore the types of solutions that become possible when
an integrated model based on fine grained localised
analysis is used to inform the development of our towns
and cities.
Mr Adam Haddow
SJB Architects
Surry Hills NSW
Co-Author: Mr Simon McPherson, SJB Urban
Shall we dense?
Population growth, climate change, development pressure,
economic growth, urban expansion and suburban
protectionism – huge forces are colliding in Australian
cities and towns, maintaining an ongoing debate and
discourse on the future form, size and ‘grain’ of our
urban areas.
Our interest emanates from our observations of
contemporary cities and the impacts of population
increases. Numerous strategic plans aim to limit urban
expansion or ‘sprawl’, towards more ‘compact’ cities.
While collectively it seems that this approach receives
support, its implementation continues to attract
resistance ‘on the ground’.
Urban density, or the amount of space that particular
development occupies, is key to this discourse on our
urban present and future.
It is our opinion that increases in densities need to be
tackled both from the ‘top down’ through strategies and
political leadership, and from the ‘bottom up’ through
individual actions. Cities have invested heavily in
strategic plans that will help change the configuration
of our living environments, but we have invested scantly
to deliver real information to individuals about the
impacts (personal and collective) of individual choice.
Our aim has been to develop a set of key criteria and
measures that clearly communicate the impact of personal
preferences in housing, thereby influencing choice.
This paper describes a process that influences from the
top-down, as well as bottom-up, assessing and comparing
cities, suburbs, centres and individual dwellings and
communicating them in a way that is easy to grasp.
The intent is to understand the complexities and
variables of urban development that affect urban quality
and economic and environmental factors (top-down), and
communicate these insights with a view to influencing
individual housing choices (bottom-up), therefore
affecting housing demand.
Mr Paul Harding
City of Onkaparinga
Seaford Meadows SA
From Grey to Green – A South Australian Journey
Historically, river and creeks in towns have become
drainage easements and storm water channels lying over
the back fence of most Australian suburbs. More
recently, however, property developers have come to
appreciate that the higher prices that riverine views
command easily offset the lot yield reduced by a one
sided street.
It is not a simple task to retrofit the existing urban
fabric to reflect the current appreciation for the
social & visual amenity of creeks, rivers and wetlands.
However it is possible in the construction of new
suburbs through thoughtfully integrated design, with
constructed wetlands, in particular, adding the
significant functional benefits of flood management and
water quality improvement
This presentation will celebrate the success of a number
of initiatives undertaken by landscape architects to
remediate riverine corridors and water
catchments,increasing social and environmental amenity
while also adding to functional performance.
It will illustrate how ‘soft engineering’ design
initiatives have been undertaken to address the damage
done to the River Torrens in SA through the remediation
of Breakout Creek into a naturalistic waterway and the
difficulties in employing this approach to remediate the
hard engineering solutions of the Sturt Creek further
south.
It will also seek to demonstrate initiatives being
undertaken in catchments within the Onkaparinga Council
including Silver Sands adjacent to the Willunga Basin
and Christie Creek via the 'Aldinga Drainage Scheme' and
'Water Proofing the South'. The presentation will be
illustrated with examples of the ‘good, the bad and the
ugly” to demonstrate some of the lessons learned.
Dr Kathi Holt-Damant
QUT Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane QLD
Co-Author: Prof Mojdeh Baratloo, Columbia University
Emerging Urban Futures: land, water, infrastructure– why
design matters
With the impact of climate change and global warming
rapidly increasing, it is clear that we need to think
differently about cities and how to work with them.
For most of us, this means renegotiating the levels of
energy we consume, conserving water usage, and becoming
smarter about our carbon footprint.
At a basic level, the issue of better understanding the
weather and working with the shift in climatic
conditions, rising flood levels, and accommodating
extremes can be dealt with across all design practices
(architecture, urban design, interior, industrial etc).
Steven Cohen, Director of the Earth Institute at
Columbia University, New York states that:
‘Policy analysts know that one cannot begin to solve a
problem until it is understood.
This includes the measurement of the problem’s
dimensions and proposed solutions. One cannot manage
something without measurement. Without measures, one
cannot tell if the management actions taken are making
matters better or worse. Without a deep conceptual
understanding of the problem, the process of developing
measures of its elements cannot begin.’
Cohen cites the example of the modern economy – where a
vast array of indicators are collected, analysed and
reported….even so the economy is far from perfect.
[Preface, from Understanding Enviromental Policy, 2006]
Similarly, urban design cannot solve these problems
until we understand what exactly the problem is.
This paper will present a number of perspectives on why
design matters to a sustainable urban environment and
how this approach can contribute to an improved quality
of the urban environment, while increasing cultural
diversity and healthy communities.
Mr Tom Jones
Woollahra Council
Double Bay NSW
The Edge of Town
Ever since the marauders were cleared from the
countryside, the towns were freed of market tariffs, and
mass transport provided an alternative to walking, urban
development has been spreading ever faster and thinner
away from the centre.
We make vain attempts to contain the dissipation, but
demand driven development is one-eyed in its desire for
homes that mimic the attributes of
the country house. We all know the result.
Meanwhile we promote the centre and sub centre’s
essential role in keeping the urban organism together.
We all agree that a healthy centre is integral to a
healthy urban identity.
There is however another physical component of urban
development that is little recognised and often denied;
the edge. Defining a limit has not been considered
progressive. Growth economy has meant a growing urban
area. So the urban edge has typically been transient,
poorly designed and ugly.
Meanwhile the need for limits is becoming increasingly
obvious. Urban consolidation is becoming an undeniable
necessity. Food security is an increasing concern. Peak
oil looms and with it the need to develop sustainable
transport systems.
Particular edge conditions are already controlled by
legislation including; asset protection zones,
agricultural buffers, and riparian zones. The edge is
becoming definable.
I will use visual images to illustrate what might happen
to the built environment when urban limits are defined.
I will consider the social, economic, aesthetic and
amenity implications and suggest that urban entities
will benefit from opportunities provided by defining the
Edge of Town.
Mr Richard Katter
THG
Fortitude Valley QLD
Co-Authors: Mr Craig Baynham & Miss Claire Kelly, THG
A Date With Density
The Great Australian Dream is providing a nightmare for
Australia’s growing population.
Australia’s rapid growth has not been accommodated by a
sufficient increase in the supply, sophistication or
efficiency of new residential dwellings. Nor has the
country’s growth been matched by adequate improvements
in the quality and provision of infrastructure. As a
result of these deficiencies, affordability and
subsequently the population’s welfare have suffered
adversely.
More recently the increased viscosity of the commercial
finance sector, the primary symptom of the global
financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, has directly impacted
construction and development activity. Consequently the
supply of new dwellings on the market is being far
exceeded by the existing and continued strong demand for
dwellings. This is a further catalyst to an already
precarious housing affordability situation. The
potential boost in demand for dwellings, once the
economy commences its recovery, will only further
exacerbate the housing affordability situation.
While this study does not focus on the environmental
impacts of increased density, there has been extensive
work done on the benefits of closer living quarters on
the environment. Research has shown that higher density
living results in heating and cooling savings,
particularly in a cooling environment such as South East
Queensland’s.
This paper will investigate how and why Australian’s
make their purchase decisions; delving the paradigms
behind the ‘Great Australian Dream’ of the four bedroom
home on a quarter acre block.
Mrs Rosemary Kennedy
Queensland University of Technology
Brisbane Qld
Climate-responsive urban design: a primer for planners,
developers and decision makers.
The Centre for Subtropical Design has produced
Subtropical Design in South East Queensland, a Handbook
for Planners, Developers and Decision Makers to
effectively expand upon the twelve guiding principles of
subtropical design for urban development which appear in
the key planning instrument for SEQ, the South East
Queensland Regional Plan 2009–2031.
As described in this paper, the handbook brings planning
and urban design theory together with climatic concerns
and concepts of liveability. Design and planning
strategies that are positive, rather than indifferent to
the local climate, landscape and culture are described.
Particular attention is paid to accessible open space
systems, pedestrian connectivity and amenity, and active
public spaces and the role that these features play in
the quality and health of urban living for all members
of society.
Though not intended to be interpreted as prescriptive
code, information in the handbook provides the common
basis for the preparation and assessment of planning
applications with design principles and strategies that
may be applied to the entire spectrum of urban scales
from the regional scale, to the city, neighbourhood,
street, individual building or site, in the subtropics.
Supported by a rich array of images and diagrams, the
handbook expands the high-level principles into
practical on-the-ground solutions and explains the
relationship between sustainable development and
subtropical design; the significance of each principle
and the interrelationships among the principles; and how
sustainable urban development that responds to local
character and identity can reduce reliance on fossil
fuels for energy and transport.
Ms Kylie Legge
Place Partners
Woollahra, Sydney NSW
Public Space as a Civic Ecosystem
Why do some public spaces work; attracting a balanced
mix of activities, people and supporting businesses, and
some not?
Successful public places are more a reflection of the
interdependent relationships evident within them, than
what they look like. Utilising a quadruple top line
methodology, of social, environmental, economic and
cultural investigations, provides the framework for a
whole of system approach. This holistic process is
called place making, the process of creating public
places that people inherently understand, participate in
and feel ownership of.
Working with the communities who use these public spaces
allows us to define the essential character of each
place, its history and stories in order to guide the
decision making process. We need a seat, but what kind
of seat and where should it be located?
Public Space as a Civic Ecosystem will share case study
research from Perth, Newcastle and Sydney projects to
illustrate the place making process and identify
criteria for successful public places.
Ms Sharon Mackay
HASSELL
Adelaide SA
Designing for Urban Ecology. The role of design in
adapting public space to support urban ecology.
Our cities have developed with distinct, designated
zones for development (city blocks) and for conservation
and recreation (parks), resulting in isolated areas of
green within the city that often fails to consider
biodiversity.
Over the next 25 years, growth in the urban population
will continue to place significant pressure on the
design of our cities. Increased housing density will
continue to reduce the green footprint within our urban
centres and place urban ecology under stress as habitat
retreats, and human-related threats rise. Our cities
need to adapt to the realities of a changing climate.
A new way of thinking is needed. This future needs to
protect and reconnect ‘green’ spaces and natural systems
into urban centres to support local ecology and promote
regeneration and biodiversity of habitat. We need to
adapt our thinking away from passive ‘conservation’ of
existing green space, to active ‘remediation’ of our
urban centres. Design can be the means to imagine and
invent a future.
Our cities' public spaces are the key to this
remediation, and in driving change across the design,
development & political sectors. A combination of more
radical policy & incentive-based measures are required
to effect substantive change.
Key to this change is demonstration projects to
authenticate research and design hypotheses. Adelaide
Zoo Entrance Precinct, designed by HASSELL considers
local urban ecology and provides a model for adapting
our built environment to the needs of native plant and
animal species through new extensive green
infrastructure including green roofs and “living” walls.
Satvir Mand
Cox Richardson Architects
Sydney, NSW
Co-Author: Neena Mand,
University of Newcastle
Case studies in transport infrastructure
interventions: Connection/ reinforcement/ enhancement of
urban fabric in Sydney
The introduction of initiatives that upgrade existing
infrastructure or the implementation of new transport
systems result in opportunities of intervention with the
primary recipient being the particular place, its
character and the quality of urban design and the public
domain. The interventions can be a minor intervention in
the case of a station upgrade, or major intervention in
the case of a new transport interchange, or it can be a
mega intervention (multiple–major) with the introduction
of a new mass transit line or system. These
interventions can be the catalyst for regeneration of a
neighbourhood at the local level or a step change at a
city level that impacts its regional and global
position. Alternatively the intervention can be
perceived as being an adverse imposition on the
established status quo of existing community, politics
and built form.
Intervention has a variety of definitions, each with a
unique interpretation in specific response to its
discipline and its outcomes. The primary use of
interventions is in social and health issues, with
secondary application in political, legal and cultural
strategies. Urban interventions have primary been
underlined by social, cultural and community issues, as
an example community participation has been facilitated
through public art. Built form - urban intervention has
been defined as when strategically targeted a positive
often larger impact results in the transformation of the
existing urban status quo.
The attributes of the station infrastructure are
intrinsically fused with the fundamental principles of
place making and urban design: land use, public domain,
built form and landscape. Transport architecture is
unique in its scale, internal function and its interface
with the public domain. However, the delivery of the
successful intervention requires the consolidation of
divergent agendas of the transport agency and the
community (and users) mediated by collaborative
interfaces by the architect / urban designer to achieve
the desired objectives.
The paper will discuss the definitions and dimensions of
intervention, and the issues and the initiatives though
the study of three recent significant transport projects
in Sydney: North Sydney Station (2008) and Chatswood
Transport Interchange (2008) and the reference design
for the potential Stage 1 of the Sydney Metro. In
conclusion the paper will examine the critical
principles that redefine urban fabric as minor, major or
mega- intervention.
Mr Jose Mantilla
AECOM
Melbourne VIC
Transit-oriented development: key climate change
mitigation strategy
This paper examines the role of transport as part of a
comprehensive climate change mitigation strategy. It
highlights the need to concurrently reduce travel demand
and promote sustainable travel modes to reduce transport
emissions. This is particularly relevant since
technology alone will not allow the transport sector to
meet greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.
While acknowledging the importance of transport in
facilitating economic development and enhancing quality
of life, this paper analyses its significant and growing
contribution to global emissions and energy consumption.
Current and future automobile dependency is examined in
detail, highlighting the continued growth in automobile
travel and expansion of the world’s automobile fleet. A
fundamental shift in travel behaviour is discussed as
both a critical goal and a major challenge for cities
worldwide.
Transit-oriented development (TOD) is a critical
strategy to shape and build urban environments that
advance a reduction in the need for travel; enhance
accessibility to goods, employment and services; provide
a variety of equitable and affordable travel
alternatives; and promote the use of energy- and
emissions-efficient modes of transport and technologies.
TOD is broadly defined here as development that promotes
urban sustainability by facilitating a redefinition of
the transport user hierarchy (pedestrians first, then
bicyclists, then public transit users and, lastly,
automobile drivers). Since single strategies tend to
have a modest effect on reducing travel and emissions,
it is suggested that future urban environments will only
yield considerable benefits as part of an integrated set
of economic, regulatory, planning, technological,
infrastructure, and behaviour initiatives.
Mr Nick McGowan
LVO' Architecture
Spring Hill QLD
Retrofitting resilience - achieving urban modularity.
Since the Industrial Revolution cities have evolved as
increasingly complex systems, and networks of systems,
with high levels of connectivity as well as dependency
on centralised infrastructure networks and resource
pools that span the globe.
This unprecedented degree of systems complexity and
connectivity has led to inherent vulnerabilities in our
urban environments which, as we face the challenges of
extreme urbanisation and the impacts of climate change,
will test their resilience, and the resilience of the
global ecosystems upon which they rely.
As Walker and Salt (2006) explain, “In resilient systems
everything is not necessarily connected to everything
else. Overconnected systems are susceptible to shocks
and they are rapidly transmitted through the system. A
resilient system opposes such a trend; it would maintain
or create a degree of modularity.”
The paper will explain how significant investment in
complex infrastructure systems has reduced the
resilience of our cities by increasing external
dependencies, diminishing relationships with ecosystem
services, and limiting transformability. The paper will
go on to make an argument for retrofitting modularity
into our urban environments as an important principal of
improving urban resilience.
The paper will also illustrate (using case studies) how
increased urban modularity would be achieved at a range
of scales and how it would enable achievement of other
objectives of urban resilience, such as tight feedbacks,
increased ecological variability, and increased response
diversity.
Mr Nick McGowan
LVO' Architecture
Spring Hill QLD
Food in the City - Past, Present, Future
Food production and the process of urbanization have
always been inextricably related. It was early advances
in agricultural practice and food storage that enabled
human settlement some 15,000 years ago and provided the
opportunity for increased reproduction and urban
population growth. Later advances in agricultural
technology enabled the formation of the first cities and
it was the control of the food systems that gave early
rulers their power.
Then it was the process of urbanization that forced
large scale agriculture out of the city. Further
technological advances enabled further dispersal of food
production systems, and today we find ourselves relying
on food production systems which span the globe and are
proving to be highly unsustainable (in terms of resource
demand and environmental degradation).
This current situation has motivated a recent
renaissance in urban agriculture as a means of providing
for the world’s ever expanding urban populations in a
way that, as well as being more sustainable and
resilient, is proving to deliver a wide range of
consequential benefits to cities.
This paper will provide an overview of urban agriculture
- the pressures and challenges that are motivating its
adoption, and the current urban agriculture models and
policies being applied worldwide – and then discuss how
(at practical, strategic, and policy levels) urban
agriculture can be more earnestly and comprehensively
developed in Australian cities.
The paper will also look at the role of the urban
designer and urban planner in enabling urban
agriculture, and investigate how an urban agricultural
future will affect the form and function of our cities.
Mr Adrian McGregor
McGregor Coxall
Manly NSW
The biocity model | a global city performance wiki to
empower sustainable design
“The so called global economy was not a permanent
institution, but a set of transient circumstances
peculiar to a time, the Indian Summer of the fossil fuel
era” James Kunstler
Never before have so many people been exposed to such a
hyper scale of impending environmental and resources
dilemmas. The capacity for catastrophic geo-political
systems failure under peak oil and climate change are
the subjects of growing international debate.
Amid mounting scientific evidence there is a growing
awareness that the forms of our contemporary cities are
not sustainable. On the back of cheap fossil fuels the
industrial revolution has spawned mega cities with
sprawling low density forms. Suburbia and its peri-urban
paraphernalia are the material outcomes of fossil fuel
planning dreams. Isolation and social dysfunction2 are
being increasingly attributed to these failed urban
forms. Postulations for the imminent end of surburbia3
are gaining momentum, spear headed by authors, film
makers and planners.
biocitystudio.com is a data driven model that proposes a
new collaborative paradigm for sustainable city making
using an open source visualiser to allow comparisons of
city performance. It is defined by a purpose to plan
cities in a far more holistic and collaborative way than
traditional silo based practices allow. Arguing that
cities should be understood as emergent ecological
biotopes this paper will explore the theoretical
territory of the biocity concept and examine the twelve
urban processes it uses to determine the relative health
of modern cities.
Mr David Mepham
Gold Coast Rapid Transit
Surfers Paradise QLD
Light Rail Transit for the Gold Coast - Achieving Place,
Pedestrian Accessibility and Transit Oriented
Development
The Gold Coast stretches along miles of beaches and
waterways. It is home to half a million people and
caters for ten million visitors each year. The City will
soon commence construction on a $1 billion light rail
project running for thirteen kilometres through a high
density urban environment.
The light rail will run through the numerous sea side
centres on the Coast. Its integration into the urban
environment has required a high quality planning and
urban design response that maximises both placemaking
and pedestrian movement.
Urban transit corridors provide high quality mobility
but they often act as obstacles to local accessibility.
In Australian cities there are a number of Bus Rapid
Transit and Light Rail Transit systems in operation and
under construction. The BRT systems tend to be highly
segregated and impermeable and tend to run on highway or
river edges or are built in tunnels. Light rail transit
corridors may have some segregated running but often run
into highly urbanised environments, on street, at grade
and supporting high quality place and pedestrian
environments.
The Gold Coast Rapid Transit project provides an
excellent example of a transit project that has been
laid out in a car oriented environment but with the
capacity to achieve a high quality place and pedestrian
experience. The presentation will look at Australian
light rail case studies and contrast with the Gold Coast
project and discuss the way in which urban design,
placemaking and pedestrian accessibility is dealt with.
Mr Bob Meyer
Cox Richardson Architects + Planners
Sydney NSW
Parramatta, the Capital of Greater Western Sydney
Parramatta has emerged as the capital of Greater Western
Sydney, an urban region with a population of 2 million
people and targeted to reach 3 million by 2036. The
challenge is to transform Sydney’s second CBD into a
capital the size and importance of Brisbane and Perth.
The urban design task is to knit together the strategic
precincts which have evolved adjacent to the centre
including the Westmead Hospital complex, the largest in
Australia and the Parramatta campus of the University of
Western Sydney. The Parramatta River and the historic
parklands can provide the key links to give this
proposed city centre an enduring character.
The 100,000 jobs to be accommodated by 2036 will need to
be distributed within the centre’s administrative,
commercial, retailing, cultural, educational, recreation
and residential precincts all connected by a network of
new and existing walkways, cycleways, roads and public
transport systems. The location of new mass transit
stations will need to be identified so as to connect the
centre with its catchment of 3 million people.
Parallel with the expansion of the established centre,
the place of Parramatta in Australia’s early history
needs to be celebrated in recognition that Governor
Phillip chose the site where settlement commenced, now
Parramatta Park, in November 1788.
The presentation will be illustrated by a series of
diagrams which will indicate how Parramatta can be
transformed into one of Australia’s most successful and
memorable capitals.
Mr Damon Moloney
Umow Lai Pty Ltd
South Yarra Vic
The Future of Wind Energy in The City
Many of the visions of the cities of the future depict
modernistic buildings adorned with foliage and topped
with roof mounted wind turbines and clad in solar
collectors. Wind energy is certainly one of the fastest
growing renewable sources currently being deployed, but
what is the reality and the likely future of
incorporating wind energy systems directly into our
cities with building integrated wind turbines and can
these help meet the energy demands of our future cities?
This paper presents the authors recent endeavours to
integrate wind turbines into both existing and new
commercial buildings around the world. There are many
engineering and commercial challenges that are currently
being faced in the renewables sector, details are
presented of the process and viability of incorporating
locally generated wind energy in commercial buildings.
The financial aspects of urban wind energy systems are
discussed including the comparison with future grid
electricity pricing.
The current state of the urban wind turbine industry is
examined including recent developments and the latest
technology. The viability of using small wind turbines
on building roof tops is presented within the context of
the current built environment and looking forward to the
future. The author’s experience in assessing the
viability of building integrated wind power systems is
presented including wind resource mapping, financial
projections, windtunnel testing and turbine testing.
Mr David Morrison
City of Stonnington
Prahran Victoria
Change and Continuity: Reconciling the past and the
present in contemporary urban renewal
Our cities are growing at an unprecedented rate.
Echoing the impact of the medium-density housing boom of
the 1960’s and 70’s, we are currently experiencing a
continuing development surge that is transforming the
inner cities of Melbourne.
Significant forces are focused upon the quantitative
dimensions of the market demand for new housing within
the inner urban areas. In the process, our inner urban
cities risk a significant erosion of their cultural
integrity and character.
The City of Stonnington was formed in 1994 through the
amalgamation of the former Cities of Prahran and
Malvern.
Stonnington had its substantive origins in the
Victorian-era; with much of its fine commercial
architecture established in the mid- to late-19th
century. Situated on the main roads of Hoddle’s early
grid, the City’s vibrant ‘village’ centres and the
renowned larger activity centres around Chapel Street,
Toorak Road, High Street and Glenferrie Road continue to
be characterized by this distinctive cultural legacy.
Despite its distinguished heritage and many exemplary
works of contemporary architecture, the City continues
to deal with threats to the integrity of this cultural
distinctiveness from poorly conceived speculative
development
What does it mean to be a Victorian-era city in the 21st
century?
At a time when many cities around the world are
beginning to look alike, how do we reconcile the often
conflicting and defended positions of ‘valued past’ and
‘contemporary present’?
Through an examination of recent case studies of
contemporary architecture and urban design practice in
the City of Stonnington, this paper explores some
current thinking around these questions.
Mr Ian Munro
Urbanismplus Ltd
Auckland Auckland
Co-Author: Dr Amanda Hyde de Kretser, Urbanismplus Ltd
An ethical argument for Centres-Based Residential
Intensification
The arguments for managing population growth through
centres-based residential intensification (CBRI) are not
new. Allowing higher density housing typologies around
key activity centres and transport interchanges are
widely understood to have both intrinsic advantages and
instrumental benefits for the environment, the community
and the economy.
In community consultation workshops, however, residents
are not accepting these arguments. They are living with
the reality of the first stages of CBRI implementation
in their communities and do not believe that the quality
of their current environment should be sacrificed so
much for ‘apparent’ long term gain.
This paper re-examines Centres Based Residential
Intensification and argues that there are three areas of
complexity that need to be re-considered if we are to
continue to ask local communities to support urban
planners on this path. It is argued that greater
attention should be paid to the physical, social and
economic nature of the 800m radius catchment circle,
more accurate understanding of market-driven development
factors around a particular activity centre is
necessary, and lastly, more work needs to be done to
ensure regional policies and development processes
support the CBRI Growth Plan.
Only then can an ethical argument be built for CBRI that
describes how the intensification process will be
seeded, how it is realistically likely to be staged in
response to market driven development factors, and how
amenities and spatial transformation can be guaranteed
to the community at each stage of growth of their
neighbourhood.
Dr Daniel O'Hare
Bond University
Gold Coast Qld
Co-Authors: Dr Bhishna Bajracharya, Bond University & Dr
Jason Byrne, Griffith University
Towards urban walkability in subtropical transit
oriented development? Two case studies in South East
Queensland
Transit oriented development (TOD) has gained ground in
Australasian urban and regional planning since the
mid-1990s. TOD networks form an important – though
incomplete – structuring element of early 21st century
regional plans for rapidly growing city regions, most
notably those surrounding Brisbane, Melbourne and Perth
respectively. TOD and urban walkability are promoted by
formal statements such as those by the UDAL(Q) (2004)
and the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment (2005).
The rediscovery of integration between transport and
urban life has coincided with a renewed awareness that
urban walkability is a critical element of urban
quality. Governments are now listening to concerns,
raised by the public health sector, that much of the
urban fabric built in the past fifty years makes walking
very difficult, and thereby contributes to major health
problems associated with physical inactivity and obesity
(House of Representatives 2009).
This paper presents the results of fieldwork involving
the comparative analysis of the walkability of an inner
Brisbane urban renewal district with that of a late 20th
century Gold Coast master planned town centre. The paper
concludes that, although the case studies contain
elements of urban walkability, these two cases
demonstrate that we still have much to learn regarding
the local implementation of walkability as a critical
element of subtropical regional TOD networks.
References:
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health
and Ageing 2009 Weighing it up: obesity in Australia.
Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Ministry for the Environment 2005 Urban Design Protocol.
Wellington: New Zealand Government.
UDAL(Q) 2004 Agenda for Urban Quality in Queensland.
Brisbane: Urban Design Alliance (Queensland).
Dr Charles Pickett
Powerhouse Museum
Haymarket NSW
Architects, the affordable house and the suburbs: a
complex relationship.
My paper will examine the relationship between
architects and generic suburban housing in Australia.
The interface between professional design and popular
housing is one of the most contentious areas of
architectural history.
The design profession has long been confident of its
ability to improve the quality of ordinary housing. At
certain times, notably the 1920s and 1950s, architects
have enjoyed considerable influence on budget suburban
housing through the War Service Homes scheme and RAIA
plan services. The work of leading architects was also
an important factor in the success of certain 1960s
project home builders.
Architects were able to offer space-maximising solutions
in a climate of austerity, but this is less relevant in
today’s housing market. Project builders have adopted
prefabrication and other modernist techniques to break
the nexus between affordability and modest house size.
Although several high-profile architects have created
designs specifically for the project home market, their
influence is challenged by the ability of the project
home industry to produce homes that are both large and
‘affordable’. As a result the endemic failings of the
generic house, in terms of liveability and
sustainability, continue largely unchallenged as does
the continued focus on developing fringe suburban areas.
What can architects offer in a climate of private
abundance? This paper will examine the contribution,
potential and actual, of the design profession to the
intractable issues of suburban density and
sustainability.
Ms Lyndal Plant
Brisbane City Council
Brisbane QLD
Green infrastructure: Taking it to the streets
Roads and streets in growth centres of Australian cities
are being upgraded and retrofitted to deliver much more
than transport functions. These streetscapes are an
essential part of urban green infrastructure, delivering
recognisable and measurable environmental, social and
economic benefits.
However, local governments are learning that to optimise
these benefits requires evidence based local targets,
new design guidelines and innovation. Skills of urban
planners, designers, landscape architects, water cycle
engineers, and urban foresters are being used to turn
transport projects in to green infrastructure investors
and Brisbane roads and streets into Subtropical
boulevards and Neighbourhood Shadeways.
Mr Robert Prestipino
Vital Places Pty Ltd
Crows Nest QLD
Regional growth secrets revealed by hidden assets on the
edge of new "capital" city
In April 2010 at the Queensland Growth Summit,
Queensland’s Premier announced that Townsville could
become the state’s second capital. The state’s regions
are now seen as part of the solution to the problems of
south-east Queensland’s rapid growth.
Traditionally, the area most ignored by the growth
management of our regional cities has been the townships
and communities on their edges. While the symptoms of
Australia’s growth have elevated State and Federal
government infrastructure spending, many of these edge
communities are suffering from the lack of growth and
aging rather than the pains of rapid growth. To date
these communities and their substantial social and
physical assets have slipped under the radar.
Since 2005, Hinchinbrook Shire, a community of 12,000
people adjacent to Townsville City has undertaken some
of the most innovative and awarded sustainable growth
initiatives in Queensland. This five year urban design
project has gathered analysis, strategic frameworks and
development plans for an implementation of over $10
million of State and Federal Government infrastructure.
This work has revealed the crisis and the opportunity of
these fringe communities to contribute to the
sustainable growth of our regional cities. Proximity,
economic transformation, aging and lifestyle provide the
ingredients to forming an innovative network of
communities that offer Townsville the opportunity to
become one of the most liveable urban regions in
Australia.
This case study presentation outlines the insights,
strategies and urban design principles that reveal the
practical secrets to delivering sustainable growth in
the regions.
Ms Deena Ridenour
Allen Jack+Cottier
Chippendale NSW
Co-Authors: Ms Libby Gallagher
Urban Retrofit - Low-Scale, High-Density Alternatives
Professionals widely accept consolidation of our
existing cities through increased density as a viable
solution to mitigate climate change. However, many
communities reject higher density housing typologies,
particular where building height exceeds the local
context. Housing purchasers continue to value housing
ownership tied to land over apartments. Planning
policies increasingly respond to these community values,
facilitating dwellings on smaller lots through complying
development standards.
Alternative infill strategies are needed to demonstrate
the potential of low-scale, high-density housing forms
that:
- support housing diversity, land ownership options and
affordability;
- enrich the public domain;
- enrich the landscape setting and ecology;
- deliver enhanced environmental housing performance.
This paper will present two case studies, exploring
alternative strategies for incremental density increases
in existing areas. Each case study is located within
walking distance of a centre, transport and services,
yet each has a significant catchment of single dwellings
on large lots.
Case Study 1: West Lindfield, Ku-ring-gai is
characterised by steep sandstone hillsides with
established native forest. A highly vocal community
campaigned actively against the introduction of
apartments.
Case Study 2: Mt Druitt, Blacktown is characterised by
an undulating landform; deep lots with small houses and
remnant protected woodland. Villas are the predominant
infill development, which typically favour high site
coverage, eradicating the landscape and delivering poor
quality housing.
A critical review of current planning approaches will be
drawn from the case studies. Recommendations for
alternatives will be proposed, demonstrating the
necessity of place-specific design, to inform planning
strategy and development controls.
Mr James Rosenwax
AECOM
Sydney NSW
Changing the way a city moves – lessons from
cycle cities
People movement is the greatest form maker of our
cities. The means and patterns of movement can destroy
or activate the vibrancy, health, and prosperity of our
urban environments. This paper presents the outcomes of
recent research into cycling policy and infrastructure
in Amsterdam, Copenhagen, and Berlin – cities that have
prioritised bicycles in their urban transport planning
and are now witnessing significant environmental,
health, social, and economic benefits as a result.
Interviews with senior transport planners, the acclaimed
urbanist Jan Gehl, and the mapping of each city’s
bicycle infrastructure reveal how such a large modal
split is fostered and the best way to deliver bicycle
infrastructure to other cities.
In Sydney each work day, 32,000 cars travel into the CBD
from less than nine kilometres away. During peak hour,
this trip is usually quicker by bicycle than by car or
public transport. In fact, 50 per cent of all car trips
in Australia are less than five kilometres. A
significant portion of these car trips could be made by
bicycle, if infrastructure and policy could facilitate
this modal shift.
The provision of legitimate policy and infrastructure,
as observed in these European cities, can advance
cycling as a popular, safe, and affordable form of urban
transport, appealing to all people regardless of their
age, gender and income.
If cities are serious about developing sustainable
transport networks, cycling cannot be overlooked. Our
infrastructure and policy requires rethinking to
position cycling as a legitimate form of transport.
Mr Jon Shinkfield
AECOM
Melbourne VIC
A Sustainable Public Realm
There is a rising imperative to treat urban development
projects as both strategic and technical challenges,
where strategy and technics are intertwined,
inseparable, inter-reliant and yet have specificity. It
is no longer adequate to consider the strategic in the
absence of a detailed understanding of the technical
construct and delivery. Our vision for uses, densities,
heights, and transport must be put forward in terms of
health, energy consumption/production, water
minimisation and reuse, social equity and inclusivity,
adaptation and flexibility, as well as embedded thinking
in natural systems, with those systems being part of a
cycle for the production of energy and food.
So what will this urban future, this paradigm of
sustainable urbanism, look like? We can often find clues
on how to move forward by looking to the past.
Historically, communities bought and sold, laboured and
produced, and were centred around trade and trading
relationships. Their focus lay in localised production,
trading, and exchange, and as a result, a corresponding
social structure evolved; where there was a need to know
a neighbour as part of daily life and sustenance; where
spaces were established as a framework for life,
gathering, selling, socialising, and communicating;
where energy and waste were conserved. Can we now look
to the future and create places that recapture these
qualities that are now so often lacking in our
contemporary urban environments, not just because of
impending environmental issues but for reasons of
health, social sustainability and community survival?
Mr Ian Sinclair
Edge Land Planning
Bowral NSW
Planning for Australia's Food Security
“Food is a sustaining and enduring necessity. Yet among
the basic essentials for life — air, water, shelter, and
food — only food has been absent over the years as a
focus of serious professional planning interest. (2007)
‘Policy Guide on Community and Regional Food Planning’
p1)
This quote is very relevant to the Australian situation.
There has been a lot of focus lately on the
Murray-Darling Basin as Australia’s food bowl – this is
not quite correct. The metropolitan fringe areas are a
significant contributor of perishable vegetables,
poultry, cut flowers, nurseries and turf. Yet this fact
has gone unrecognised by Governments – both here and
elsewhere in the world.
The fringe of Metropolitan Sydney is one of the State’s
food bowls. It produces $1 billion of agricultural
produce each year. It has a good climate and is close to
the main population centre. However the landscape is
made up of mostly rural residential development (78% of
all uses are rural residential). This leads to many
problems that need to be addressed in a multifaceted way
to ensure that we have a sustainable future and a secure
food supply. The issues being faced in Sydney are also
being faced in other areas around Australia.
This session will draw upon the knowledge of the author
about planning for rural and metro fringe areas in
Australia and overseas. It will also draw upon analysis
of the 2006 Agricultural Census Data.
Ms Caroline Stalker
Architectus Brisbane Pty Ltd
Brisbane QLD
LODs – the future of TODs
Australian city-making in the 20th century was driven by
a sense of endless resources. This has left us with
cities that are so excessive in their resource
consumption (land, materials, water, air) that they are
now adversely affecting the fundamental well-being of
the population they support (resource depletion,
ecological degradation, Climate Change).
In this context at Architectus we have been undertaking
design research, running collaborative workshops, and
undertaking project work through which we have
consistently sought to address wider concerns of how to
make successful denser and more resource efficient
development in our region. Our particular concern is how
we can make desirable urban environments while improving
compactness and access to public transport. Each time we
come back to the fundamental importance of: urban
landscape as both an ecological and amenity resource;
and city making that pursues an integrated vision of
buildings AND landscape simultaneously. As we make TOD,
we need to also make LOD.
Key strategies for LOD include:
Utilising and consolidating the escarpments,
watercourses and flood prone lands as key structuring
elements of our settlement pattern, providing landscape
amenity and ecological resources for populations living
at higher densities.
Locating greater residential density where it has the
potential to have a strong relationship to landscape as
a combined ecological, sustainability and community
resource.
Creating networks of urban spaces and places which help
us deal with Climate Change, through assisting in
micro-climatic management or urban precincts, flood and
water management.
In very dense urban settings, interweaving communal
landscape spaces through ‘vertical villages’.
‘Re-calibrating urban streets’ as useable public and
urban landscape resources – particularly looking at the
special characteristics of subtropical and tropical
streetscapes.
Making more of the ‘urban edge’ - the zone that
integrates building and urban landscape – in design.
Dr Jane Tarran
AILA / UTS
Clovelly NSW
Benefits of Green Infrastructure: integrating vegetation
into planning for human settlement
Over half the world's population now live in urban
ecosystems; in many countries the proportion is 80-90%.
These ecosystems consist of various components including
the biotic community (humans plus locally native and
introduced flora, fauna and microorganisms) and the
physical environment (both natural features and built
infrastructure). The field of urban ecology is exploring
ways of making and managing settlements such that
greater attention is given to supporting functional
ecosystems that ultimately underpin our survival, as
well as strengthening community resilience.
Photosynthetic organisms are a critical part of natural
ecosystems, since they can harness the sun’s energy and
produce food for themselves and other organisms. They
are also critical to urban ecosystems, providing a range
of benefits. Benefits to people include many in addition
to food, such as environmental, aesthetic, social,
psychological, health and property-related economic
benefits. As climate change receives greater
recognition, plants will play an increasingly important
role in both mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Furthermore, urban areas offer opportunities for
biodiversity conservation that have been largely
overlooked to date.
Unfortunately, these diverse benefits of Green
Infrastructure have not yet been fully recognised by
urban planners and managers, by many urban dwellers
themselves or by our national and state governments. At
the same time, we are losing, incrementally, existing
Green Infrastructure (GI) and potential future areas for
GI as we consolidate our cities and towns. This paper
considers both the benefits of GI and the impediments to
achieving worthwhile GI in our urban areas.
Mr Philip Thalis
Hill Thalis Architecture + Urban Projects
Surry Hills NSW
Public Space for a Democratic Society
Relationship to Conference Topics;
- The future of public spaces
- Effective governance and leadership
- Sustainable higher density development
- Resilience and Preparedness
The leading Spanish urbanist Manuel de Sola Morales
observed that the best urban projects “mitigate the
requirements of infrastructure with a concern for the
monumental and scenic value of public works… The Urban
Project means taking the geography of a given city, with
its demands and suggestions, as a starting point …to
give form to the site. The Urban Project means bearing
in mind the complexity of the work to be carried out
rather than a rational simplification of the urban
structure. Moreover it means working in an inductive
manner, generalising what is particular, strategic,
local and generative.”
Another Modern Tradition 1987
The Urban Project, the most potent modus operandi for
intervening in the city, needs to encompass the
following;
1 Conceived in the knowledge of urban intensity,
delivered with maximum public benefit, engaged with the
future wellbeing of the city
2 Characterised by the its content - based on thorough
research, and propositions - based on sound ideas
3 Inflected to the particular, temporal and local
conditions of the host city
4 Test the frontiers between public and private values
and spaces, considering equity
5 While inevitably subject to the prevailing processes
and politics, be a forward-looking counter-project that
challenges preconceived notions of planning,
infrastructure and city making
6 Suggest engaging possibilities of living in and
enlivening our cities
The paper focuses on recent urban projects and research
in Sydney which have wide applicability to the
contemporary urban debate.
Mr Mark Thomson
Schiavello
Milton Qld
Eco-retrofitting Existing Cities with "Positive
development"
Professor Janis Birkeland conceived the concept of
"Posiive Development" identifying that the built
environment can provide greater life quality,health,
amenity and safety for all, without sacrificing
resources.Adopting this new paradigm encourages
"eco-retrofitting"of the vast urban fabric of our
existing cities.
"Eco retrofitting" of our cities forms a significant
design challenge. In order to meet our 2020 and 2050
greenhouse gas reduction targets proposed by the
Australian Government and world community at the 2010
Copenhagen Summit, progress on serious "eco
retrofitting" must commence now.
"Eco-retrofitting" strategies will be explored in the
proposed paper/workshop presentations for the 3rd
International Urban Design Conference.
The practical implementation of 'eco-retrofitting"
results in resilient built solutions demonstrating
energy efficiency and ecologically sustainable urban
design.Examples include the introduction of urban
agriculture ,the integration of living walls and green
roofs in buildings,the efficient provision of denser
workplaces and living solutions and the focus on
improved social quality."Eco-retrofitting" promotes
socially responsible design and embraces community
participation. Diversity and density are key ingredients
of successful "eco-retrofitting".
Research work currently underway at QUT's Centre for
Sub-tropical Design will be presented to demonstrate the
latest developments on Living walls, an innovative
"green technology" providing a multitude of
environmental benefits for urban designers.The
importance of the "Environmental Brief" process to urban
design projects will be demonstrated to highlight how
ESD is successfully integrated into our existing cities
urban fabric.
Conclusions from a detailed focus on eco-retrofitting
will provide delegates with a practical understanding of
'Positive Development". This awarenes will facilitate
fundamental and essential change in our existing
cities,moving towards achieving the important goals of
greenhouse gas reduction and quality of life
improvements in denser urban environments
Mr Mark Urizar
Urizar and Partner Architects
Ascot Vale VIC
Enabling Sustainability in the Urban Environment
There is no ‘off the shelf’ vision or definitive
direction that can be used to define the most socially
responsible course. It is evident that urban expansion
should be halted with the existing built form
consolidated, integrated and enhanced so that it can
become a self reliant and synergistic whole. This
becomes viable when economies of scale are created, when
densities are increased; making it viable to restructure
and enhance the urban form to accept higher densities
and amenities with more appropriate technologies.
Valuable insight is drawn from IT and Nature as to how
our urban environment should be structured and work. IT
provides a framework for the architecture in place;
defining how it should be structured to be effective, as
it can be analogous to buildings, or components of the
network and infrastructure, with the software providing
the necessary connections required for the system to
work. Insight from nature can provide new clues how our
built environment should be restructure, how its many
systems should work, how these should interact, be
balanced in terms of needs, consumption, outputs,
generative capacity and limits. Replicating nature in
our built environment would ensure the balance between
the artificial and natural, and ensure that the many
disparate parts of the urban environment be aligned and
integrated into a synergistic whole.
Replacing planning with a ‘holistic’ approach can
provide the means to protect and even enhance the
remaining ecological infrastructure through the
appropriateness of the solutions created; enabling
integrated architecture within an enhanced
infrastructure.
Dr Arvind Varshney
HASSELL
Sydney NSW
Co-Authors: Dr Mike Mouritz & Brett Pollard, HASSELL
Urban sustainability through consensus: a blue
print for an integrated assessment of the urban
environment
This paper argues in favour of two commonly debated
issues: first, cities and the ongoing process of
urbanisation hold the key to global sustainability; and
second, the urban environment is the single most
significant factor that adversely affects the synergy
between the human and natural components of a city
leading to unsustainable development.
Based on above discussion the paper suggests that the
multidisciplinary nature of sustainability, and indeed
the multiplicity of stakeholders in the development and
management of cities, is one of the major barriers in
the pursuit of sustainable development. It leads to the
lack of appropriate knowledge, awareness, and consensus
among the public and decision makers. Which in turn
results in inadequate or inappropriate planning and
management decisions leading to further deterioration of
state of sustainability at urban and, consequently,
global levels.
The paper proposes that the integrated measurement and
assessment of attributes of urban systems and the
embodied built environment is a key issue in developing
consensus amongst all stakeholders in urban development
and management.
The paper presents a case for, and a blueprint of, a
system for assessment of the urban environment that
addresses:
1. ecological, social and economic aspects of a city,
and
2. allows the environmental impacts to be aggregated
with global environmental impacts.
Such an assessment system that is flexible to its
context, location, and application, the paper argues,
will help the stakeholders understand the issues
relevant to urban sustainability. This will add to the
current understanding about urban development leading to
greater consensus, and hence to better decision making
for progressing towards sustainability.
Mr Jason Veale
AECOM
Sydney NSW
Co-Author: Mr Lester Partridge, AECOM
Urban form and low-carbon buildings
Significant advances have been made in recent years to
reduce the environmental impact of new buildings. There
are strong regulatory requirements for energy and water
efficiency. Voluntary programs such as Green Star and
NABERS are increasingly popular. Certain parts of the
development market are competing for the highest star
rating. However, on an industry-wide scale, emissions
from the commercial building sector are rising faster
than almost all other greenhouse emissions sectors. An
increasing proportion of the population is living in
large cities. Therefore, it is essential that urban
design helps, rather than hinders, buildings to reduce
their emissions in the coming decades.
This paper analyses the carbon emissions from various
building types and discusses the ability of urban form
and density to facilitate very low carbon buildings. Do
very high densities actually increase energy use over
medium densities? The paper considers an optimum urban
form to reduce energy used to operate buildings,
transport emissions and the emissions used in the
manufacture of building materials. It is suggested that
this optimum form should change from city to city
depending on whether they are in a temperate, cold,
humid or hot arid climate.
Mr Michael Velders
ARUP
Fortitude Valley QLD
Farming in SlimCity – The Business Case for
Urban Ecology
Climate change, water shortages, rising crude oil prices
and an expanding population are beginning to question
the resilience of our current farming and food supply
systems. In the near future localised food production –
integrated into the city’s infrastructures – might well
be a key factor in securing access to affordable and
healthy food for new and existing communities. Michael’s
presentation makes a strong case for localised
integrated food production in a Slim City – the resource
and carbon efficient cities of the future.
Michael Velders will be presenting from his personal
experience working on “New Generation Urban Agriculture”
projects in Europe, the America’s, China and Australia.
He is a senior sustainability consultant with Arup
having more than 15 years experience in consulting. He
mastered in Agricultural and Environmental engineering
and Change Management and is committed to help implement
initiatives that strive to make a difference to society.
Michael enables clients in setting the bar for
sustainable development; clarifying achievable and
practical targets and initiatives. His particular
interest lies in identifying “How we can feed ourselves
sustainably in a low carbon economy?” Amongst others he
leads Arup’s Centre of Excellence in Food and
Agriculture.
Mr John Walmsley
Hyder Consulting
North Sydney NSW
Co-Author: Mr Richard Lau, Director - Building Services
Hyder Consulting
The benefits of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in
optimizing the energy efficiency and thermal comfort of
a building.
Aim: To demonstrate by using Computational Fluid
Dynamics that the energy efficiency and thermal comfort
of a building can be optimised which can result in
substantial savings.
Contents: Currently within the Australian Market CFD is
rarely used when designing a building. Computational
Fluid Dynamics uses algorithms to solve and analyze
fluid flows and displays these results in a 3D
representation of the space. In a building some of the
main components that CFD software can examine are the
air temperature, air velocity, air change effectiveness
and thermal comfort.
By using Computational Fluid Dynamics the grille
locations, supply air rates, supply air temperatures and
even the building facade can be optimised to help
increase thermal comfort and energy efficiency with the
space.
One example of the benefits of CFD can be seen in one of
our past projects. To increase energy efficiency it was
proposed that the supply air temperature should be
reduced allowing for the Supply Air to the space to also
be reduced, thus minimising the size of the Air Handling
Units which decreases the energy consumption within the
building. The issue with this was that by reducing the
supply air temperature there was a potential problem
that the thermal comfort would be unsatisfactory. By
using CFD it was determined that the thermal comfort
throughout the space would not be affected. On this
project we also examined the grille locations to confirm
that there was a high air change effectiveness and a
well dispersed temperature over the floor. Overall this
CFD modelling resulted in substantial energy savings.
Conclusion: As proven in past projects by using
Computational Fluid Dynamics the energy efficiency and
thermal comfort of the building can be optimised which
can result in substantial savings.
Mr Simon Whibley
Antarctica
Melbourne Victoria
Co-Author: Mr Graham Crist, Antarctica
Distributing the City
Major metropolitan centres appear to be incapable of
providing for the increase in urban populations
currently occurring in Australia. The economic costs of
extending infrastructure and the social problems caused
by peripheral expansion are well documented, whilst
political opposition and construction expense associated
with increasing density around existing centres, or
within selected suburban nodes, limits the potential of
infill solutions.
Looking at one such metropolitan centre, Melbourne, and
its surrounding regions, how might the necessary
activities and civic amenities of the city be
accommodated differently to unsustainable peripheral
expansion or contested nodal densification? How we can
undertake the tasks, and enjoy the benefits, of urban
life in a wider array of locations?
In order to cater for new populations, a distributed
city can make use of existing networks of activity to
accommodate the requirements of work and civic facility.
It can extend such utility across the boundaries of
metropolitan and regional centres, increasing the
resilience of each. It is a design approach that is
opportunistic, responsive and robust.
Case studies drawn from research projects undertaken at
RMIT University, alongside executed architectural
projects, will be presented. These projects investigate
the common but loosely defined idea of a ‘hub’, ranging
in scale from systems of distributed workplace across
Victoria to alternative proposals to the Central
Activity District (CAD) within Melbourne.
Mr Wally Wight
Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO)
Gaythorne Queensland
Re-Thinking the Dwelling
Much is said of housing affordability, sustainability
and community. Our typical suburban house is 30% larger
than 20 years ago, yet household size is smaller. Even
first-time homeowners insist on more bedrooms than
people and extensive extras. “Affordable” is relegated
to far-flung fringes. This trend cannot go on forever.
However, higher density is perceived as “six-pack”
walk-ups or impersonal highrise. We have few models
demonstrating a way forward.
We need a new paradigm. Instead of maximising floor area
and features, we need more effective and amenable
utilisation of the more limited floor area and features
we can afford. Instead of sizing all houses for large
families, we must offer genuine choice. This paper
argues an alternative way forward. There is more
opportunity in existing patterns of subdivision and
flexibility in existing planning codes than appreciated.
Existing urban fabric and character has the resilience
and capacity to accommodate innovation.
This case study is based on infill and an existing
one-bed “drover’s cottage astride narrow existing
allotments in a pre-war low-density suburb.
Separating titles, utilising existing development codes,
advantageous site attributes and sub-tropical design,
issues of affordability, sustainability and community
are addressed. The result achieves site densities
equivalent to 32 households (or 64 dwellings) per
hectare with high amenity and a very light footprint.
The dwelling choice ranges from 3-bed to studio and
explores innovative concepts of household and community
dynamics. Not a silver bullet, this demonstrates the
value of looking outside the square.
Mr David Wilson
MWH Global
St Leonards, Sydney NSW
Future population shocks and the need for urban
growth management
Australia is in the middle of a population boom it needs
to acommodate 35 million people by 2050. Currently,
about 443,000 people are added to our population every
year. The figure used to be just 220,000. This is being
generated by immigration rates and a generation X driven
baby boom. Even with our present population of 22
million the deterioration in the quality of life in our
cities is obvious schools, hospitals, transport systems
and water supply are already inadequate.
In the next 40 years, Brisbane and Perth will double in
size. Sydney and Melbourne will expand into mega cities
of 7 million each. As more people fill out the urban
areas, and sprawl continues to consume non-renewable
resources, there is a pressing need to generate ideas
for expanding Autralian Cities.
Australia cities are experiencing constant change but
are they heading in the right direction? Fedederal
Government needs to develop a robust and co-ordinated
engagement to facilitate urban growth management
throughtout Austalia to respond to demographic
change.Growth options need to be tested against four key
drivers of change:
Demographics and migration;
Economics and employment
Transport and technology
Climate change and resource use
This paper will examine current planning tools and
strategies for example Sydney 2031, Melbourne 2030, SE
Queensland Regional Plan, urban containment management,
urban growth zones, infrastructure delivery, integrted
land use and transport planning.The advantages and
disadvantages of applying these to respond to population
growth will be assessed
Word Count 239 Words
Mr Brett Wood-Gush
TPG Town Planning and Urban Design
Perth WA
Co-Author: Mrs Susan Oosthuizen, LandCorp
Mining Town to Regional Australian City: Karratha, City
of the North
The challenges facing remote mining based communities
are many: social isolation, employment monocultures,
ageing infrastructure, limited cultural and recreational
opportunities, combined with the sense of impermanence
and insecurity created by a fly-In fly-out (FIFO)
workforce and the unpredictability of global resource
markets, perpetually undermine the development of social
and civic capital and economic security.
Karratha faces these challenges and the failings
consequential of a 1970s design approach that was
insensitive to the local climate, local landscape and
local culture. Never the less, Karratha is now seen, by
all levels of government and by social commentators such
as Bernard Salt, to be the logical location of a vital
new Australian city; laying claim to our north west
coast and supporting Australia’s most significant
emerging resources region.
A key aim of the City of the North project is to
facilitate the realization of this vision by providing a
blue print for Karratha’s evolution into a city. A
partnership between the Shire of Roebourne and State
Government has, in the space of less than 6 months, seen
the preparation of a plan that provides a framework for
sustainable growth detailing, in design and strategy,
the necessary responses to city growth, neighbourhood
and city centre revitalisation, housing diversity,
affordable living, place responsive design, community
development and infrastructure investment.
The presentation explores this landmark project and asks
how we use government partnerships and collaborative
design-based approaches to engage stakeholders and
attract and guide the massive private and public sector
investment needed to create a regional city.
Mr Graham Young
University of Pretoria
Tshwane Gauteng
Finding the void … a vision for a public park in
Johannesburg’s inner city
The problems of postmodern urban environments became
obvious with the proliferation of sprawling cities,
gated enclaves and residential communities. The result
of this scattered system has ‘decompressed’ many cities.
Johannesburg, however, is unlike many other ‘new world’
cities where ‘decompression’ is a major issue. In fact
the reverse is true! People are flocking to the inner
city, from the townships, rural areas and other African
countries to find work and a place to live.
Johannesburg’s CBD is instead ‘compressed’ and available
land for open space is extremely elusive and mostly
derelict.
The Johannesburg Development Agency initiated a design
competition for a “large inner city park” because “the
growing residential densities within the inner city
coupled with the lack of adequate green public open
space suggests the need for a large scale inner city
park.” The competition call also implied that a public
park intervention is necessary as it could be a catalyst
for development. But where in Johannesburg’s dense,
‘compressed’ CBD, does one find this scale and form of
space?
This paper will examine the issues related to
conceptualing a vision for the park through the lens of
a competition entry. It will also make reference to
landscape urbanism theory to illustrate that in spite of
seemingly insurmountable odds, space can be found to
enable the development of an inner city park and that
the resultant landscape can become a basic building
block in a contemporary approach to urbanism that
emphasizes the primacy of a dynamic void over static
architecture.